lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f5e2d98-4c4a-4a8b-b041-200bb1fc3e7e@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 12:02:29 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Peter Wang (王信友) <peter.wang@...iatek.com>,
 "chu.stanley@...il.com" <chu.stanley@...il.com>,
 "James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com"
 <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, "robh@...nel.org"
 <robh@...nel.org>, "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Macpaul Lin (林智斌) <Macpaul.Lin@...iatek.com>,
 "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 "alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
 "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: "macpaul@...il.com" <macpaul@...il.com>,
 Pablo Sun (孫毓翔) <pablo.sun@...iatek.com>,
 Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
 <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
 Bear Wang (萩原惟德) <bear.wang@...iatek.com>,
 Ramax Lo (羅明遠) <Ramax.Lo@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: add MT8195
 compatible and update clock nodes

On 20/10/2025 11:44, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
>>
>> Consider stepping down and choosing them if they better understand
>> how
>> upstream works.
>>
>> As Rob wrote earlier:
>>
>> "Sounds like we need a new maintainer then. They clearly don't
>> understand that downstream doesn't exist."
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
> 
> I must reiterate that I do not oppose patches that are 
> beneficial to the community; I only object to patches that are 
> not helpful.


Let's quote you again:

"*In addition*, it will require MediaTek to put in extra
effort to migrate the kernel. "

This is ADDITIONAL argument you used. This is what you wrote, this is
what you claimed to be ADDITIONAL argument.

In your opinion ADDITIONAL argument is downstream and you still do not
understand why such argument is instant NAK for you as reviewer.


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ