[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f5e2d98-4c4a-4a8b-b041-200bb1fc3e7e@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 12:02:29 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Peter Wang (王信友) <peter.wang@...iatek.com>,
"chu.stanley@...il.com" <chu.stanley@...il.com>,
"James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, "robh@...nel.org"
<robh@...nel.org>, "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Macpaul Lin (林智斌) <Macpaul.Lin@...iatek.com>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: "macpaul@...il.com" <macpaul@...il.com>,
Pablo Sun (孫毓翔) <pablo.sun@...iatek.com>,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
Bear Wang (萩原惟德) <bear.wang@...iatek.com>,
Ramax Lo (羅明遠) <Ramax.Lo@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: add MT8195
compatible and update clock nodes
On 20/10/2025 11:44, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
>>
>> Consider stepping down and choosing them if they better understand
>> how
>> upstream works.
>>
>> As Rob wrote earlier:
>>
>> "Sounds like we need a new maintainer then. They clearly don't
>> understand that downstream doesn't exist."
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
> I must reiterate that I do not oppose patches that are
> beneficial to the community; I only object to patches that are
> not helpful.
Let's quote you again:
"*In addition*, it will require MediaTek to put in extra
effort to migrate the kernel. "
This is ADDITIONAL argument you used. This is what you wrote, this is
what you claimed to be ADDITIONAL argument.
In your opinion ADDITIONAL argument is downstream and you still do not
understand why such argument is instant NAK for you as reviewer.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists