[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1062228.1760956530@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 11:35:30 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/17] crypto: jitterentropy - use default sha3 implementation
Why don't you take my approach and just call lib/crypto/sha3 directly rather
than using a crypto/ object as an intermediary if that crypto/ object is just
going to wrap lib/crypto?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists