linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: display: msm: Document the Glymur Mobile Display SubSystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <72b90092-20d6-4d66-bda3-297213749563@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 12:46:04 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
 Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, Abhinav Kumar
 <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>, Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
 Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
 Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: display: msm: Document the Glymur
 Mobile Display SubSystem

On 20/10/2025 12:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 03:38:26PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
>> Add MDSS/MDP display subsystem for Qualcomm Glymur SoC, which is
>> is 2 minor version increase compared to SM8750.
> 
> This suggests that at least some of the compatibles listed in the
> binding would be compatible with SM8750. None of them are, so I find the
> message confusing.

Heh, I found answers in individual patches. Well, this is still a bit
misleading but does not matter that much:

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof