linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: add MT8195 compatible and update clock nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dac87028c2ec19dae78a26aa729b950bd3f677c9.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 10:49:05 +0000
From: Peter Wang (王信友) <peter.wang@...iatek.com>
To: "chu.stanley@...il.com" <chu.stanley@...il.com>,
	"James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com"
	<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
	"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Macpaul Lin (林智斌)
	<Macpaul.Lin@...iatek.com>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "alim.akhtar@...sung.com"
	<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, "krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "matthias.bgg@...il.com"
	<matthias.bgg@...il.com>, "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
	"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: "macpaul@...il.com" <macpaul@...il.com>,
	Pablo Sun (孫毓翔) <pablo.sun@...iatek.com>,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
	<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
	Bear Wang (萩原惟德) <bear.wang@...iatek.com>,
	Ramax Lo (羅明遠) <Ramax.Lo@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: add MT8195
 compatible and update clock nodes

On Mon, 2025-10-20 at 12:02 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> Let's quote you again:
> 
> "*In addition*, it will require MediaTek to put in extra
> effort to migrate the kernel. "
> 
> This is ADDITIONAL argument you used. This is what you wrote, this is
> what you claimed to be ADDITIONAL argument.
> 
> In your opinion ADDITIONAL argument is downstream and you still do
> not
> understand why such argument is instant NAK for you as reviewer.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski,

I acknowledge that this was indeed a lack of consideration 
on my part, and I must apologize for making such statements.
Nevertheless, I have also clarified that this was not the main
reason for my objection, the actual reason is
"removing these DTS settings will make what was originally
a simple task more complicated."
And then, when I asked you about the main reason and its 
relation to downstream, you just kept repeating “ADDITIONAL.”
Why not address the issue directly and tell me what the 
benefit is of making the code more complicated?

Thanks
Peter