[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <707a01ee36c28863bdc6a4444a5560e9a0b19597.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 00:10:45 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "chenhuacai@...nel.org" <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, "frankja@...ux.ibm.com"
<frankja@...ux.ibm.com>, "maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>,
"borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com" <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>, "pjw@...nel.org"
<pjw@...nel.org>, "aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"kas@...nel.org" <kas@...nel.org>, "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"maobibo@...ngson.cn" <maobibo@...ngson.cn>, "pbonzini@...hat.com"
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, "maddy@...ux.ibm.com" <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
"palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>, "imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com"
<imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>, "zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn"
<zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>, "anup@...infault.org" <anup@...infault.org>,
"oliver.upton@...ux.dev" <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
CC: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev"
<linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>, "Zhao, Yan
Y" <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, "michael.roth@....com" <michael.roth@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Weiny, Ira"
<ira.weiny@...el.com>, "loongarch@...ts.linux.dev"
<loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>, "binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com"
<binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>, "ackerleytng@...gle.com"
<ackerleytng@...gle.com>, "kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev" <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@...gle.com>, "kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org"
<kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/25] KVM: TDX: Bug the VM if extended the initial
measurement fails
On Thu, 2025-10-16 at 17:32 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> WARN and terminate the VM if TDH_MR_EXTEND fails, as extending the
> measurement should fail if and only if there is a KVM bug, or if the S-EPT
> mapping is invalid, and it should be impossible for the S-EPT mappings to
> be removed between kvm_tdp_mmu_map_private_pfn() and tdh_mr_extend().
>
> Holding slots_lock prevents zaps due to memslot updates,
> filemap_invalidate_lock() prevents zaps due to guest_memfd PUNCH_HOLE,
> and all usage of kvm_zap_gfn_range() is mutually exclusive with S-EPT
> entries that can be used for the initial image. The call from sev.c is
> obviously mutually exclusive, TDX disallows KVM_X86_QUIRK_IGNORE_GUEST_PAT
> so same goes for kvm_noncoherent_dma_assignment_start_or_stop, and while
> __kvm_set_or_clear_apicv_inhibit() can likely be tripped while building the
> image, the APIC page has its own non-guest_memfd memslot and so can't be
> used for the initial image, which means that too is mutually exclusive.
>
> Opportunistically switch to "goto" to jump around the measurement code,
> partly to make it clear that KVM needs to bail entirely if extending the
> measurement fails, partly in anticipation of reworking how and when
> TDH_MEM_PAGE_ADD is done.
>
> Fixes: d789fa6efac9 ("KVM: TDX: Handle vCPU dissociation")
> Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
Per the discussion in v2, shouldn't it go after patch 24 'KVM: TDX: Guard VM
state transitions with "all" the locks'? Otherwise it introduces a KVM_BUG_ON()
that can be triggered from userspace. not a huge deal though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists