lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251021154339.GA1191348@bhelgaas>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 10:43:39 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mbrugger@...e.com,
	guillaume.gardet@....com, tiwai@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: of: Downgrade error message on missing of_root node

On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 05:32:19PM +0200, Andrea della Porta wrote:
> When CONFIG_PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES is enabled, an error message
> is generated if no 'of_root' node is defined.
> 
> On DT-based systems, this cannot happen as a root DT node is
> always present. On ACPI-based systems, this is not a true error
> because a DT is not used.
> 
> Downgrade the pr_err() to pr_info().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/of.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
> index 3579265f1198..034486593210 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/of.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
> @@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ void of_pci_make_host_bridge_node(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>  
>  	/* Check if there is a DT root node to attach the created node */
>  	if (!of_root) {
> -		pr_err("of_root node is NULL, cannot create PCI host bridge node\n");
> +		pr_info("of_root node is NULL, cannot create PCI host bridge node\n");

If we're going to see this message in the normal course of events on
ACPI systems, I think maybe we should reword it so it assumes less
context.  "of_root node" is low-level technical detail that doesn't
even make sense to me without digging into the code.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ