[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPerDcMFdbWecGEv@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:47:25 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] reset: make the provider of reset-gpios the parent
of the reset device
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 05:23:33PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 5:03 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 05:55:02PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:39:41AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:31 AM Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > > > > On Di, 2025-10-21 at 11:27 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
[...]
> > > > > No need to convert all existing drivers right away, but I'd like to see
> > > > > a user that benefits from the conversion.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The first obvious user will be the reset-gpio driver which will see
> > > > its core code simplified as we won't need to cast between OF and
> > > > fwnodes.
> > >
> > > +1 to Bart's work. reset-gpio in current form is useless in all my cases
> > > (it's OF-centric in 2025! We should not do that in a new code).
> > >
> > > More over, conversion to reset-gpio from open coded GPIO APIs is a clear
> > > regression and I want to NAK all those changes (if any already done) for
> > > the discrete components that may be used outside of certainly OF-only niche of
> > > the platforms.
> >
> > To be clear, the conversion that's done while reset-gpio is kept OF-centric.
> > I'm in favour of using it, but we need to make it agnostic.
>
> As of now, the whole reset framework is completely OF-centric, I don't
> know what good blocking any such conversions would bring? I intend to
> convert the reset core but not individual drivers.
Blocking making new regressions?
Otherwise as long as reset framework and reset-gpio are agnostic, I'm pretty
much fine with the idea and conversion.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists