lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <181af756-09a1-4694-98c4-53cea556e172@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 21:21:37 +0530
From: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
        Abhinav Kumar
 <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
        Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] dt-bindings: display/msm/gmu: Document A612 RGMU

On 10/19/2025 2:43 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/10/2025 19:08, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> RGMU a.k.a Reduced Graphics Management Unit is a small state machine
>> with the sole purpose of providing IFPC (Inter Frame Power Collapse)
>> support. Compared to GMU, it doesn't manage GPU clock, voltage
>> scaling, bw voting or any other functionalities. All it does is detect
>> an idle GPU and toggle the GDSC switch. As it doesn't access DDR space,
>> it doesn't require iommu.
>>
>> So far, only Adreno 612 GPU has an RGMU core. Document RGMU in the GMU's
>> schema.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/gmu.yaml       | 98 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/gmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/gmu.yaml
>> index afc1879357440c137cadeb2d9a74ae8459570a25..a262d41755f09f21f607bf7a1fd567f386595f39 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/gmu.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/gmu.yaml
>> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ properties:
>>        - items:
>>            - pattern: '^qcom,adreno-gmu-x[1-9][0-9][0-9]\.[0-9]$'
>>            - const: qcom,adreno-gmu
>> +      - items:
>> +          - const: qcom,adreno-rgmu-612.0
>> +          - const: qcom,adreno-rgmu
>>        - const: qcom,adreno-gmu-wrapper
>>  
>>    reg:
>> @@ -45,24 +48,30 @@ properties:
>>      maxItems: 7
>>  
>>    interrupts:
>> -    items:
>> -      - description: GMU HFI interrupt
>> -      - description: GMU interrupt
> 
> 
> Both stay, just explain what is the first interrupt. You should not drop
> descriptions here. Look at every other binding - of course except that
> terrible Adreno GPU which is anti-example.

Do you mean we should use a OneOf and list both combo? Or elaborate the
description of the first interrupt to include OOB too? Something like:

- description: HFI interrupt on GMU and OOB interrupt on RGMU.

Sorry, I am a bit confused.

> 
>> +    minItems: 2
>> +    maxItems: 2
>>  
>>    interrupt-names:
>> -    items:
>> -      - const: hfi
>> -      - const: gmu
>> +    oneOf:
>> +      - items:
>> +          - const: hfi
>> +            description: GMU HFI interrupt
> 
> No, descriptions never go to xxx-names, but to xxx.
> 
>> +          - const: gmu
>> +            description: GMU interrupt
>> +      - items:
>> +          - const: oob
>> +            description: GMU OOB interrupt
>> +          - const: gmu
>> +            description: GMU interrupt
>> +
>>  
>>    power-domains:
>> -    items:
>> -      - description: CX power domain
>> -      - description: GX power domain
>> +    minItems: 2
>> +    maxItems: 3
> 
> No.
I will keep the 'description'. Here, RGMU has 3 power domains instead of
2. I suppose we should add the description for the 3rd power domain here
and keep 'minItems: 2' property to override the default 3?

> 
>>  
>>    power-domain-names:
>> -    items:
>> -      - const: cx
>> -      - const: gx
>> +    minItems: 2
>> +    maxItems: 3
> 
> 
> No. Why?
Same as above.

> 
>>  
>>    iommus:
>>      maxItems: 1
>> @@ -86,6 +95,44 @@ required:
>>  additionalProperties: false
>>  
>>  allOf:
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            const: qcom,adreno-rgmu-612.0
>> +    then:
>> +      properties:
>> +        reg:
>> +          items:
>> +            - description: Core RGMU registers
>> +        reg-names:
>> +          items:
>> +            - const: gmu
>> +        clocks:
>> +          items:
>> +            - description: GMU clock
>> +            - description: GPU CX clock
>> +            - description: GPU AXI clock
>> +            - description: GPU MEMNOC clock
>> +            - description: GPU SMMU vote clock
>> +        clock-names:
>> +          items:
>> +            - const: gmu
>> +            - const: cxo
>> +            - const: axi
>> +            - const: memnoc
>> +            - const: smmu_vote
>> +        power-domains:
>> +          items:
>> +            - description: CX power domain
>> +            - description: GX power domain
>> +            - description: VDD_CX power domain
>> +        power-domain-names:
>> +          items:
>> +            - const: cx
>> +            - const: gx
>> +            - const: vdd_cx
> 
> This does not make even sense. Why did you remove the the common list
> from  power-domain-names?
> 
>> +
>>    - if:
>>        properties:
>>          compatible:
>> @@ -313,13 +360,26 @@ allOf:
>>            items:
>>              - const: gmu
>>      else:
>> -      required:
>> -        - clocks
>> -        - clock-names
>> -        - interrupts
>> -        - interrupt-names
>> -        - iommus
>> -        - operating-points-v2
>> +      if:
>> +        properties:
>> +          compatible:
>> +            contains:
>> +              const: qcom,adreno-rgmu
>> +      then:
>> +        required:
>> +          - clocks
>> +          - clock-names
>> +          - interrupts
>> +          - interrupt-names
>> +          - operating-points-v2
>> +      else:
> 
> No. Don't nest multiple ifs.

I guess we should split this. I will add a 'required' constraint to the
rgmu constraints above. And apply the below 'required' constraint
specifically to 'qcom,adreno-gmu' instead of the 'else' fallback case.

Please let me know if you have any suggestion.

-Akhil>
>> +        required:
>> +          - clocks
>> +          - clock-names
>> +          - interrupts
>> +          - interrupt-names
>> +          - iommus
>> +          - operating-points-v2
>>  
>>  examples:
>>    - |
>>
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ