[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bx5zarozwnlogznjai2242und55z5jxs4bpgliswuo7shezbma@ri2ocyj7n4q7>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 12:10:14 -0400
From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
rppt@...nel.org, surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jinnasujing@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmstat: Fix indentation in fold_diff function.
* Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> [251021 05:03]:
> On 10/21/25 09:37, Jing Su wrote:
> > Adjust misaligned braces in the fold_diff function to improve
> > code readability and maintain consistent coding style.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jing Su <jingsusu@...iglobal.com>
> > ---
> > mm/vmstat.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
> > index bb09c032eecf..63860c3d22e6 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmstat.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
> > @@ -782,13 +782,13 @@ static int fold_diff(int *zone_diff, int *node_diff)
> > if (zone_diff[i]) {
> > atomic_long_add(zone_diff[i], &vm_zone_stat[i]);
> > changes++;
> > - }
> > + }
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS; i++)
> > if (node_diff[i]) {
> > atomic_long_add(node_diff[i], &vm_node_stat[i]);
> > changes++;
> > - }
> > + }
> > return changes;
> > }
>
> Thanks. IMHO it would be even more readable if the for () also had {
> }brackets.
Yes, I agree. That's probably how this happened in the first place.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists