linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] nft_ct: Added nfct_seqadj_ext

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aPe1_kECjXm3Ydfb@strlen.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:34:06 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Andrii Melnychenko <a.melnychenko@...s.io>
Cc: pablo@...filter.org, kadlec@...filter.org, phil@....cc,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] nft_ct: Added nfct_seqadj_ext_add() for NAT'ed
 conntrack.

Andrii Melnychenko <a.melnychenko@...s.io> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> > I think this needs something like this:
> >
> >       if (!nfct_seqadj_ext_add(ct))
> >            regs->verdict.code = NF_DROP;
> 
> Okay - I'll update it. I'm planning a proper test.
> 
> Apparently, I need to provide a simple test FTP server/client, not
> fully functional,
> but sufficient to "trigger" nf_conntrack_ftp.

Argh, I forgot we do have an ftp test case in the nftables repo, even
with NAT.

tests/shell/testcases/packetpath/nat_ftp

in nftables.git repo from git.netfilter.org.

So it would be easier to extend that instead of a new kselftest for the
kernel.

>From a short glance I guess it works because the address rewrite doesn't
need to expand the packet, else this should have failed and found this
bug...