[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8be3663-42db-4c8e-cb5c-b7f28aaefc04@gentwo.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 10:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@...two.org>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mark.rutland@....com, harisokn@...zon.com,
ast@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
memxor@...il.com, zhenglifeng1@...wei.com, xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com,
joao.m.martins@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] arm64: barrier: Support
smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()
On Thu, 16 Oct 2025, Ankur Arora wrote:
> +#define SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT 1
A way to disable the spinning in the core code and thus arm64 wont spin
there anymore. Good.
Spinning is bad and a waste of cpu resources. If this is done then I
would like the arch code to implement the spinning and not the core so
that there is a motivation for the arch maintainer to
come up with a way to avoid the spinning at some point.
The patch is ok as is.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter (Ampere) <cl@...two.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists