[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42f11845-35f2-40e0-b860-c25ba6f8d503@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 20:00:13 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
David Rhodes <david.rhodes@...rus.com>,
Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>,
Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>,
Brian Austin <brian.austin@...rus.com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: cs4271: Fix cs4271 I2C and SPI drivers
automatic module loading
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 08:14:43PM +0200, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> "Reparing" them as Herve proposed would result in I2C modules being
> loaded only via "of:" style modalias and SPI still via "spi:". Which
> sounds all but consistent.
> If SPI ever adopts the same of_device_uevent_modalias(), both backends
> would require "of:" prefixed modalias, and it will not be possible to
> load the proper one for the corresponding bus type.
> What are your thoughs on this?
Or at least you'd get both modules loaded with one being redundant. TBH
I'm very reluctant to touch this stuff for SPI without some very careful
analysis that it's not going to cause things to explode on people, right
now things seem to be working well enough so I'm not clear we'd be
solving an actual problem.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists