linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] memory: tegra: Support EMC dfs on Tegra186/Tegra194

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALHNRZ9nXYRgjmpbR5KiQpsSf4hu4=qcgoh8F9_5b9yXF_5Btw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 14:19:49 -0500
From: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] memory: tegra: Support EMC dfs on Tegra186/Tegra194

On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 2:11 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 21/10/2025 20:29, Aaron Kling via B4 Relay wrote:
> > This series borrows the concept used on Tegra234 to scale EMC based on
> > CPU frequency and applies it to Tegra186 and Tegra194. Except that the
> > bpmp on those archs does not support bandwidth manager, so the scaling
> > iteself is handled similar to how Tegra124 currently works.
> >
> > This was originally part of a larger series [0], but it was requested to
> > be split into smaller series.
> >
> > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250909-tegra186-icc-v2-0-09413724e781@gmail.com
>
> Please keep correct versioning and changelog in the future. Try yourself:
>
> b4 diff '<20251021-tegra186-icc-p2-v1-0-39d53bdc9aab@...il.com>'
> Grabbing thread from
> lore.kernel.org/all/20251021-tegra186-icc-p2-v1-0-39d53bdc9aab@...il.com/t.mbox.gz
> ---
> Analyzing 6 messages in the thread
> Could not find lower series to compare against.
>
> I think I emphasized last time how important is to make it readable and
> easy for maintainers.

You said to split it, which I don't see how that means anything other
than 'make new series'. How am I supposed to keep versioning when I
had to make three entirely new series?

Aaron