[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iLt7rnXBaTBv=-ztKro39h1hECQS_Ov9Cn1eBcfhXDaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 21:42:30 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sudeep.Holla@....com, linuxarm@...wei.com,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, zhanjie9@...ilicon.com, zhenglifeng1@...wei.com,
yubowen8@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Add the verification of
processor FFH LPI state
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 11:38 AM Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Both ARM64 and RISCV architecture would validate Entry Method of LPI
> state and SBI HSM or PSCI cpu suspend. Driver should return failure
> if FFH of LPI state are not ok.
First of all, I cannot parse this changelog, so I don't know the
motivation for the change.
Second, if _LPI is ever used on x86, the
acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe() in acpi_processor_get_power_info() will
get in the way.
Why does the evaluation in acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_dev() not work?
> Fixes: a36a7fecfe60 ("ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states")
> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> index 5684925338b3..b0d6b51ee363 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -1264,7 +1264,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_dev(struct acpi_processor *pr,
>
> dev->cpu = pr->id;
> if (pr->flags.has_lpi)
> - return acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(pr->id);
> + return 0;
>
> return acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_cx(pr, dev);
> }
> @@ -1275,7 +1275,13 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_power_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
>
> ret = acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(pr);
> if (ret)
> - ret = acpi_processor_get_cstate_info(pr);
> + return acpi_processor_get_cstate_info(pr);
> +
> + if (pr->flags.has_lpi) {
> + ret = acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(pr->id);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("Processor FFH LPI state is invalid.\n");
> + }
>
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.33.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists