lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878qh3keyh.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 16:33:26 -0700
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
 Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Dan
 Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] dmaengine: idxd: Fix lockdep warnings when
 calling idxd_device_config()

Hi,

Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> writes:

> On 8/21/25 15:59, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
>> Move the check for IDXD_FLAG_CONFIGURABLE and the locking to "inside"
>> idxd_device_config(), as this is common to all callers, and the one
>> that wasn't holding the lock was an error (that was causing the
>> lockdep warning).
>
> What is "the lockdep error"? I don't see any details about an error in
> the changelog here or the cover letter?

I should have added the lockdep splat here, idxd_reset_done() is calling
idxd_device_config() without holding the lock, and the lockdep assert
inside idxd_device_config() complains about that.

I thought the commit message ("one wasn't holding") and the code would
be clear enough. In case of a another version the series, I will add the
information here.


Cheers,
-- 
Vinicius

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ