[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPcb8MMIJ2ve64yD@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 22:36:48 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@...il.com>
Cc: James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: wd33c93: fix buffer overflow in SCSI message-in
handling
This exploit really needs a catchy name. Just think of how much
valuable data you could extract by selling malicious fake 8-bit
SCSI disks to retro computing enthusiasts and then exploiting their
SCSI HBA driver.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 09:08:04PM -0500, Yuhao Jiang wrote:
> A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the wd33c93 SCSI driver's
> message handling where missing bounds checking allows a malicious
> SCSI device to overflow the incoming_msg[] buffer and corrupt kernel
> memory.
>
> The issue occurs because:
> - incoming_msg[] is a fixed 8-byte buffer (line 235 in wd33c93.h)
> - wd33c93_intr() writes to incoming_msg[incoming_ptr] without
> validating incoming_ptr is within bounds (line 935)
> - For EXTENDED_MESSAGE, incoming_ptr increments based on the device-
> supplied length field (line 1085) with no maximum check
> - The validation at line 1001 only checks if the message is complete,
> not if it exceeds buffer size
>
> This allows an attacker controlling a SCSI device to craft an extended
> message with length field 0xFF, causing the driver to write 256 bytes
> into an 8-byte buffer. This can corrupt adjacent fields in the
> WD33C93_hostdata structure including function pointers, potentially
> leading to arbitrary code execution.
>
> Add bounds checking in the MESSAGE_IN handler to ensure incoming_ptr
> does not exceed buffer capacity before writing. Reject oversized
> messages per SCSI protocol by sending MESSAGE_REJECT.
>
> Reported-by: Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@...il.com>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/wd33c93.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/wd33c93.c b/drivers/scsi/wd33c93.c
> index dd1fef9226f2..2d50a0a01726 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/wd33c93.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/wd33c93.c
> @@ -932,6 +932,19 @@ wd33c93_intr(struct Scsi_Host *instance)
> sr = read_wd33c93(regs, WD_SCSI_STATUS); /* clear interrupt */
> udelay(7);
>
> + /* Prevent buffer overflow from malicious extended messages */
> + if (hostdata->incoming_ptr >= sizeof(hostdata->incoming_msg)) {
> + printk("wd33c93: Incoming message too long, rejecting\n");
> + hostdata->incoming_ptr = 0;
> + write_wd33c93_cmd(regs, WD_CMD_ASSERT_ATN);
> + hostdata->outgoing_msg[0] = MESSAGE_REJECT;
> + hostdata->outgoing_len = 1;
> + write_wd33c93_cmd(regs, WD_CMD_NEGATE_ACK);
> + hostdata->state = S_CONNECTED;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hostdata->lock, flags);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> hostdata->incoming_msg[hostdata->incoming_ptr] = msg;
> if (hostdata->incoming_msg[0] == EXTENDED_MESSAGE)
> msg = EXTENDED_MESSAGE;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
---end quoted text---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists