linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] net: enetc: Add i.MX94 ENETC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <be03d7a5-8839-4c84-9e16-b96e52f6983a@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 09:14:37 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, claudiu.manoil@....com, vladimir.oltean@....com,
 xiaoning.wang@....com, Frank.Li@....com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 richardcochran@...il.com
Cc: imx@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] net: enetc: Add i.MX94 ENETC support

On 10/16/25 12:20 PM, Wei Fang wrote:
> i.MX94 NETC has two kinds of ENETCs, one is the same as i.MX95, which
> can be used as a standalone network port. The other one is an internal
> ENETC, it connects to the CPU port of NETC switch through the pseudo
> MAC. Also, i.MX94 have multiple PTP Timers, which is different from
> i.MX95. Any PTP Timer can be bound to a specified standalone ENETC by
> the IERB ETBCR registers. Currently, this patch only add ENETC support
> and Timer support for i.MX94. The switch will be added by a separate
> patch set.
> 
> ---
> Note that the DTS patch (patch 8/8) is just for referenece, it will be
> removed from this patch set when the dt-bindings patches have been
> reviewed. It will be sent for review by another thread in the future.

Note that such patch is (AFAICS) breaking Robert's tests. Including it
in this series will possibly/likely prevent (or at least slow down) acks
on the initial dst patches. I suggest omitting such patch in the next
iteration.

Thanks,

Paolo