linux-kernel - [PATCH V3] netrom: Prevent race conditions between neighbor operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251021083505.3049794-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 16:35:05 +0800
From: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@...driver.com>
To: <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <horms@...nel.org>,
        <kuba@...nel.org>, <linux-hams@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lizhi.xu@...driver.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        <syzbot+2860e75836a08b172755@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3] netrom: Prevent race conditions between neighbor operations

The root cause of the problem is that multiple different tasks initiate
SIOCADDRT & NETROM_NODE commands to add new routes, there is no lock
between them to protect the same nr_neigh.

Task0 can add the nr_neigh.refcount value of 1 on Task1 to routes[2].
When Task2 executes nr_neigh_put(nr_node->routes[2].neighbour), it will
release the neighbour because its refcount value is 1.

In this case, the following situation causes a UAF on Task2:

Task0					Task1						Task2
=====					=====						=====
nr_add_node()
nr_neigh_get_dev()			nr_add_node()
					nr_node_lock()
					nr_node->routes[2].neighbour->count--
					nr_neigh_put(nr_node->routes[2].neighbour);
					nr_remove_neigh(nr_node->routes[2].neighbour)
					nr_node_unlock()
nr_node_lock()
nr_node->routes[2].neighbour = nr_neigh
nr_neigh_hold(nr_neigh);								nr_add_node()
											nr_neigh_put()
											if (nr_node->routes[2].neighbour->count
Description of the UAF triggering process:
First, Task 0 executes nr_neigh_get_dev() to set neighbor refcount to 3.
Then, Task 1 puts the same neighbor from its routes[2] and executes
nr_remove_neigh() because the count is 0. After these two operations,
the neighbor's refcount becomes 1. Then, Task 0 acquires the nr node
lock and writes it to its routes[2].neighbour.
Finally, Task 2 executes nr_neigh_put(nr_node->routes[2].neighbour) to
release the neighbor. The subsequent execution of the neighbor->count
check triggers a UAF.

The solution to the problem is to use a lock to synchronize each add a
route to node, but for rigor, I'll add locks to related ioctl and route
frame operations to maintain synchronization.

syzbot reported:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in nr_add_node+0x25db/0x2c00 net/netrom/nr_route.c:248
Read of size 4 at addr ffff888051e6e9b0 by task syz.1.2539/8741

Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 nr_add_node+0x25db/0x2c00 net/netrom/nr_route.c:248

Reported-by: syzbot+2860e75836a08b172755@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2860e75836a08b172755
Signed-off-by: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@...driver.com>
---
V1 -> V2: update comments for cause uaf
V2 -> V3: sync neighbor operations in ioctl and route frame, update comments

 net/netrom/nr_route.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/netrom/nr_route.c b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
index b94cb2ffbaf8..debe3e925338 100644
--- a/net/netrom/nr_route.c
+++ b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static HLIST_HEAD(nr_node_list);
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nr_node_list_lock);
 static HLIST_HEAD(nr_neigh_list);
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nr_neigh_list_lock);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(neighbor_lock);
 
 static struct nr_node *nr_node_get(ax25_address *callsign)
 {
@@ -633,6 +634,8 @@ int nr_rt_ioctl(unsigned int cmd, void __user *arg)
 	ax25_digi digi;
 	int ret;
 
+	guard(mutex)(&neighbor_lock);
+
 	switch (cmd) {
 	case SIOCADDRT:
 		if (copy_from_user(&nr_route, arg, sizeof(struct nr_route_struct)))
@@ -765,6 +768,7 @@ int nr_route_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, ax25_cb *ax25)
 	nr_dest = (ax25_address *)(skb->data + 7);
 
 	if (ax25 != NULL) {
+		guard(mutex)(&neighbor_lock);
 		ret = nr_add_node(nr_src, "", &ax25->dest_addr, ax25->digipeat,
 				  ax25->ax25_dev->dev, 0,
 				  READ_ONCE(sysctl_netrom_obsolescence_count_initialiser));
-- 
2.43.0