lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list] 
Message-ID: <68f760aa.050a0220.346f24.000d.GAE@google.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 03:30:02 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+10e35716f8e4929681fa@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, horms@...nel.org, 
	kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	pabeni@...hat.com, sgarzare@...hat.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, 
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [virt?] [net?] possible deadlock in vsock_linger

Hello,

syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
possible deadlock in vsock_linger

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.0.17/6384 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888055028b18 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1679 [inline]
ffff888055028b18 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: vsock_linger+0x25e/0x4d0 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:1080

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff906260a8 (vsock_register_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: vsock_assign_transport+0xf2/0x900 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:469

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (vsock_register_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:598 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x193/0x1060 kernel/locking/mutex.c:760
       vsock_assign_transport+0xf2/0x900 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:469
       vsock_connect+0x201/0xee0 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:1592
       __sys_connect_file+0x141/0x1a0 net/socket.c:2102
       __sys_connect+0x13b/0x160 net/socket.c:2121
       __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2127 [inline]
       __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2124 [inline]
       __x64_sys_connect+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:2124
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xcd/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x126f/0x1c90 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x179/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       lock_sock_nested+0x41/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3720
       lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1679 [inline]
       vsock_linger+0x25e/0x4d0 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:1080
       virtio_transport_close net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1271 [inline]
       virtio_transport_release+0x52a/0x640 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1291
       vsock_assign_transport+0x320/0x900 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:502
       vsock_connect+0x201/0xee0 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:1592
       __sys_connect_file+0x141/0x1a0 net/socket.c:2102
       __sys_connect+0x13b/0x160 net/socket.c:2121
       __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2127 [inline]
       __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2124 [inline]
       __x64_sys_connect+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:2124
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xcd/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(vsock_register_mutex);
                               lock(sk_lock-AF_VSOCK);
                               lock(vsock_register_mutex);
  lock(sk_lock-AF_VSOCK);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz.0.17/6384:
 #0: ffffffff906260a8 (vsock_register_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: vsock_assign_transport+0xf2/0x900 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:469

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6384 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) 
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_circular_bug+0x275/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2043
 check_noncircular+0x14c/0x170 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x126f/0x1c90 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x179/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
 lock_sock_nested+0x41/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3720
 lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1679 [inline]
 vsock_linger+0x25e/0x4d0 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:1080
 virtio_transport_close net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1271 [inline]
 virtio_transport_release+0x52a/0x640 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1291
 vsock_assign_transport+0x320/0x900 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:502
 vsock_connect+0x201/0xee0 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:1592
 __sys_connect_file+0x141/0x1a0 net/socket.c:2102
 __sys_connect+0x13b/0x160 net/socket.c:2121
 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2127 [inline]
 __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2124 [inline]
 __x64_sys_connect+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:2124
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xcd/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f300598efc9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f3006912038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002a
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f3005be5fa0 RCX: 00007f300598efc9
RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 0000200000000000 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007f3005a11f91 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007f3005be6038 R14: 00007f3005be5fa0 R15: 00007ffdba0a0048
 </TASK>


Tested on:

commit:         6548d364 Merge tag 'cgroup-for-6.18-rc2-fixes' of git:..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=162a5492580000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f3e7b5a3627a90dd
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=10e35716f8e4929681fa
compiler:       gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14+deb12u1) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
patch:          https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=17a04e7c580000

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ