[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251021012533.56rdl6v76plkw4nl@master>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 01:25:33 +0000
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz, surenb@...gle.com,
mhocko@...e.com, jackmanb@...gle.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
ziy@...dia.com, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] page_alloc: allow migration of smaller hugepages
during contig_alloc.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 05:08:16PM -0400, Gregory Price wrote:
>We presently skip regions with hugepages entirely when trying to do
>contiguous page allocation. Instead, if hugepage migration is enabled,
>consider regions with hugepages smaller than the requested allocation.
>
>Compaction `isolate_migrate_pages_block()` already expects requests
isolate_migratepages_block() ?
>with hugepages to originate from alloc_contig, and hugetlb code also
>does a migratable check when isolating in `folio_isolate_hugetlb()`.
>
>Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
>---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>index 600d9e981c23..da2e65bf63e3 100644
>--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>@@ -7048,8 +7048,19 @@ static bool pfn_range_valid_contig(struct zone *z, unsigned long start_pfn,
> if (PageReserved(page))
> return false;
>
>- if (PageHuge(page))
>- return false;
>+ if (PageHuge(page)) {
>+ unsigned int order;
>+
>+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_HUGEPAGE_MIGRATION))
>+ return false;
>+
>+ /* Don't consider moving same size/larger pages */
>+ page = compound_head(page);
>+ order = compound_order(page);
How about using folio_large_order(page_folio(page)) ?
>+ if ((order >= MAX_PAGE_ORDER) ||
>+ (nr_pages < (1 << order)))
>+ return false;
>+ }
> }
> return true;
> }
>--
>2.51.0
>
Generally LGTM
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Powered by blists - more mailing lists