[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251022134431.8220-1-coking@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:44:31 +0100
From: Colin Ian King <coking@...dia.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] io_uring: Fix incorrect ordering of assinments of sqe and opcode
Currently opcode is being assigned to a dereferenced pointer sqe before
sqe is being assigned. It appears the order of these two assignments cs
the wrong way around. Fix this by swapping the order of the assignments.
Fixes: 31dc41afdef2 ("io_uring: add support for IORING_SETUP_SQE_MIXED")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <coking@...dia.com>
---
io_uring/fdinfo.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/fdinfo.c b/io_uring/fdinfo.c
index d5aa64203de5..5b26b2a97e1b 100644
--- a/io_uring/fdinfo.c
+++ b/io_uring/fdinfo.c
@@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ static void __io_uring_show_fdinfo(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct seq_file *m)
if (sq_idx > sq_mask)
continue;
- opcode = READ_ONCE(sqe->opcode);
sqe = &ctx->sq_sqes[sq_idx << sq_shift];
+ opcode = READ_ONCE(sqe->opcode);
if (sq_shift) {
sqe128 = true;
} else if (io_issue_defs[opcode].is_128) {
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists