[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87qzuvrr74.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:39:27 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Aryan Srivastava <aryan.srivastava@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra
<vigneshr@...com>, Elad Nachman <enachman@...vell.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0] mtd: rawnand: marvell: fix 8bit ECC layouts
On 22/10/2025 at 14:37:52 +13, Aryan Srivastava <aryan.srivastava@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
> These were modified to appease a check in nand_scan_tail. This change led
> to the last spare bytes never being written to or read from.
>
> Modify the fix by restoring the layouts and setting ecc->steps to the
> full_chunk_cnt value in the 8 bit ECC cases (4k and 8k page size). This
> allows the driver to continue reading/writing all chunks while also
> passing the check in nand_scan_tail.
>
> Fixes: e6a30d0c48a1 ("mtd: rawnand: marvell: fix layouts")
> Signed-off-by: Aryan Srivastava <aryan.srivastava@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c
> index 303b3016a070..c20feacbaca8 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c
> @@ -292,10 +292,10 @@ static const struct marvell_hw_ecc_layout marvell_nfc_layouts[] = {
> MARVELL_LAYOUT( 2048, 512, 8, 2, 1, 1024, 0, 30,1024,64, 30),
> MARVELL_LAYOUT( 2048, 512, 16, 4, 4, 512, 0, 30, 0, 32, 30),
> MARVELL_LAYOUT( 4096, 512, 4, 2, 2, 2048, 32, 30, 0, 0, 0),
> - MARVELL_LAYOUT( 4096, 512, 8, 4, 4, 1024, 0, 30, 0, 64, 30),
> + MARVELL_LAYOUT( 4096, 512, 8, 5, 4, 1024, 0, 30, 0, 64, 30),
> MARVELL_LAYOUT( 4096, 512, 16, 8, 8, 512, 0, 30, 0, 32, 30),
> MARVELL_LAYOUT( 8192, 512, 4, 4, 4, 2048, 0, 30, 0, 0, 0),
> - MARVELL_LAYOUT( 8192, 512, 8, 8, 8, 1024, 0, 30, 0, 160, 30),
> + MARVELL_LAYOUT( 8192, 512, 8, 9, 8, 1024, 0, 30, 0, 160, 30),
> MARVELL_LAYOUT( 8192, 512, 16, 16, 16, 512, 0, 30, 0, 32,
> 30),
> };
>
> @@ -2286,7 +2286,16 @@ static int marvell_nand_hw_ecc_controller_init(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> }
>
> mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &marvell_nand_ooblayout_ops);
> - ecc->steps = l->nchunks;
> +
> + /* Validity checks in nand_scan_tail assume even sized chunks, but in the case of 8bit
> + * ECC with 4k/8k page size the last chunk is spare data, which is not sized to the data
> + * chunks. Overwrite the ecc->steps to pass this validity check, while maintaining the
> + * correct number of chunks in-driver.
> + */
I am not a big fan of this approach, I wonder whether we should relax
the check in nand_scan_tail() or not. Maybe we could avoid the error in
the core by just printing a warning, this way the drivers would not need
to lie to the core.
What I would suggest, now that I properly understood the problem, is to:
1. Revert Elad's patchset *entirely* (including the revert of
existing/valid but with little use layouts).
2. Relax the check in the core.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists