linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] spi: dt-bindings: spi-qpic-snand: Add IPQ5424 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49eb9f15-fad9-4f8d-1463-04cd692bbe51@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 20:50:52 +0530
From: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <andersson@...nel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] spi: dt-bindings: spi-qpic-snand: Add IPQ5424
 compatible

Hi,

On 10/22/2025 4:12 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 12:29:01PM +0530, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
>> On 10/22/2025 12:39 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 04:35:26PM +0530, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
>>>> IPQ5424 contains the QPIC-SPI-NAND flash controller which is the same as
>>>> the one found in IPQ9574. So let's document the IPQ5424 compatible and
>>>> use IPQ9574 as the fallback.
> 
>>> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.
> 
>> Thank you for the feedback. I’d appreciate a bit more clarity on what
>> “doesn't apply against current code” refers to in this context. I’ve
>> manually applied the patch against the latest mainline (torvalds/linux) and
>> it applied cleanly without any conflicts. Please let me know if there’s a
>> specific tree or integration point I should be checking against.
> 
> I tried to apply it to the spi tree
> 
>    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-6.19
Thanks for letting me know — I’ll rebase the patch on the SPI tree 
(for-6.19) and resend it.

Thanks,
Alam.