[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251022112344.113da927@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 11:23:44 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
rostedt@...nel.org, Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily
Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] unwind: Implement compat fp unwind
On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 12:48:07 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 12:39:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > Yes, this should do nicely. I've made the changes, I'll do a test build
> > and then push out to the robots.
>
> Ok, this now lives here:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git unwind/cleanup
>
> Suppose this all comes back clean from the robots, where shall I merge
> it? tip/perf/core, tip/x86/core ?
I've been basing all my perf work off of tip/perf/core, so perhaps use that branch?
Thanks!
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists