[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251022201953.GA206947-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:19:53 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: adriana <adriana@...sta.com>
Cc: krzk@...nel.org, jdelvare@...e.com, frowand.list@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradread.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, vasilykh@...sta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] DMI: Scan for DMI table from DTS info
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 04:45:25AM -0700, adriana wrote:
> Some bootloaders like U-boot, particularly for the ARM architecture,
> provide SMBIOS/DMI tables at a specific memory address. However, these
> systems often do not boot using a full UEFI environment, which means the
> kernel's standard EFI DMI scanner cannot find these tables.
I thought u-boot is a pretty complete UEFI implementation now. If
there's standard way for UEFI to provide this, then that's what we
should be using. I know supporting this has been discussed in context of
EBBR spec, but no one involved in that has been CC'ed here.
> This series adds support for the kernel to find these tables by
> reading properties from the Device Tree /chosen node. The bootloader
> can specify the physical addresses using "linux,smbios-table" and
> "linux,smbios3-table".
/chosen node entries go in chosen.yaml schema in dtschema repository.
But first, I need to see some agreement this is how we want to support
this.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists