[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251022063402.87318-2-phasta@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 08:34:03 +0200
From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>,
Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...lia.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/sched: Fix race in drm_sched_entity_select_rq()
In a past bug fix it was forgotten that entity access must be protected
by the entity lock. That's a data race and potentially UB.
Move the spin_unlock() to the appropriate position.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.13+
Fixes: ac4eb83ab255 ("drm/sched: select new rq even if there is only one v3")
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
index 5a4697f636f2..aa222166de58 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
@@ -552,10 +552,11 @@ void drm_sched_entity_select_rq(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(entity->rq, entity);
entity->rq = rq;
}
- spin_unlock(&entity->lock);
if (entity->num_sched_list == 1)
entity->sched_list = NULL;
+
+ spin_unlock(&entity->lock);
}
/**
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists