[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPiDwUn-D2_oyx2T@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 00:12:01 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@...el.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>, intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@...el.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 26/26] vfio/xe: Add vendor-specific vfio_pci driver
for Intel graphics
There is absolutely nothing vendor-specific here, it is a device variant
driver. In fact in Linux basically nothing is ever vendor specific,
because vendor is not a concept that does matter in any practical sense
except for tiny details like the vendor ID as one of the IDs to match
on in device probing.
I have no idea why people keep trying to inject this term again and
again.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists