[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<TY2PPF5CB9A1BE61219A29CA15C87D7AEB5F2F3A@TY2PPF5CB9A1BE6.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 08:28:40 +0000
From: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, BMC-SW <BMC-SW@...eedtech.com>, Rob
Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor
Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Andrew Jeffery
<andrew@...econstruct.com.au>, "jk@...econstruct.com.au"
<jk@...econstruct.com.au>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann
<arnd@...db.de>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@....qualcomm.com>, Geert
Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
"nfraprado@...labora.com" <nfraprado@...labora.com>, Taniya Das
<quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, Lad Prabhakar
<prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>, Kuninori Morimoto
<kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 3/6] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed,ast2x00-scu: allow
#size-cells range
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed,ast2x00-scu: allow
> #size-cells range
>
> On 22/10/2025 09:05, Ryan Chen wrote:
> > The #size-cells property in the Aspeed SCU binding is currently fixed
> > to a constant value of 1. However, newer SoCs (ex. AST2700) may
> > require two size cells to describe certain subregions or subdevices.
> >
> > This patch updates the schema to allow #size-cells values in the range
> > of 1 to 2. This makes the binding more flexible while maintaining
> > compatibility with existing platforms.
> > It also resolves dt-binding validation warnings reported by `make
> > dt_binding_check`.
>
> There is no such warning! I think I told you that already. Don't invent fake,
> future warnings.
Sorry, I understand your point, will remove this patch.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists