[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFr4G5m_tnC20w-K7Nh2m-ut77rbeHvWgDTgHLA0hkALNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 12:03:02 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: gs101-pmu: allow
power domains as children
On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 at 18:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 21/10/2025 14:59, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >> + "^power-domain@[0-9a-f]+$":
> >> + type: object
> >> + description: Child node describing one power domain within the PMU
> >> +
> >
> > I think we should specify the power-domain-cells too, along the lines
> > of the below.
> >
> > '#power-domain-cells'
> > const: 0
>
> That's not needed. The child (this child device node) schema will
> enforce it. Parent (so the PMU) is supposed only to list compatible.
Ah, I see. Thanks for clarifying!
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists