[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <bb26wdvihppk6wjpy3ysijfxaj6kofw7zbich4b72bwwnl7fec@cpkvrdhpkj3e>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 20:03:42 +0800
From: "Coly Li" <colyli@...as.com>
To: "tanze" <tanze@...inos.cn>
Cc: <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>, <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] bcache: Use vmalloc_array() to improve code
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 07:13:06PM +0800, tanze wrote:
> Remove array_size() calls and replace vmalloc(), Due to vmalloc_array() is optimized better,
> uses fewer instructions, and handles overflow more concisely[1].
>
> Signed-off-by: tanze <tanze@...inos.cn>
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
> index 826b14cae4e5..dc568e8eb6eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
> @@ -1061,8 +1061,7 @@ SHOW(__bch_cache)
> uint16_t q[31], *p, *cached;
> ssize_t ret;
>
> - cached = p = vmalloc(array_size(sizeof(uint16_t),
> - ca->sb.nbuckets));
> + cached = p = vmalloc_array(ca->sb.nbuckets,sizeof(uint16_t));
^^^-> a blank missing?
> if (!p)
> return -ENOMEM;
Except for the missing blank, overall the patch is fine.
BTW, IMHO tanze is not a formal method to spell the name, could you please
use a formal format? It will be helpful to identify your contribution in
future.
Thanks.
Coly Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists