[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd629133-0ddc-47fe-b6e1-24ec8adbea67@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 07:20:48 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com, corbet@....net,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, chao.gao@...el.com,
hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/21] x86/cea: Prefix event stack names with ESTACK_
On 10/13/25 18:09, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
> Add the ESTACK_ prefix to event stack names to improve clarity and
> readability. Without the prefix, names like DF, NMI, and DB are too
> brief and potentially ambiguous.
>
> This renaming also prepares for converting __this_cpu_ist_top_va from
> a macro into a function that accepts an enum exception_stack_ordering
> argument, without requiring changes to existing callsites.
Yup, the rename looks good.
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists