[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251023032742.2850029-1-kunwu.chan@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 11:27:42 +0800
From: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@...ux.dev>
To: paulmck@...nel.org,
frederic@...nel.org,
neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org,
joelagnelf@...dia.com,
josh@...htriplett.org,
boqun.feng@...il.com,
urezki@...il.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
jiangshanlai@...il.com,
qiang.zhang@...ux.dev
Cc: rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Improve comments for RCU_FANOUT and RCU_FANOUT_LEAF
From: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
The original comments introduced in commit 05c5df31afd1
("rcu: Make RCU able to tolerate undefined CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT"),
contained confusing annotations.
Specifically, the #else and #endif comments did not clearly reflect
their corresponding condition blocks, hampering readability.
Fixes condition branch comments. And adds explicit explanations of
the overall purpose:
defining middle/leaf fan-out parameters, their relation to Kconfig,
and how they shape the RCU hierarchy based on CPU count.
Make the hierarchical configuration logic of the RCU easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
---
include/linux/rcu_node_tree.h | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcu_node_tree.h b/include/linux/rcu_node_tree.h
index 78feb8ba7358..b03c0ce91dec 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcu_node_tree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcu_node_tree.h
@@ -25,26 +25,34 @@
/*
* Define shape of hierarchy based on NR_CPUS, CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, and
* CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF.
+ * - RCU_FANOUT: Controls fan-out of middle levels in the RCU hierarchy.
+ * - RCU_FANOUT_LEAF: Controls fan-out of the leaf level (directly managing CPUs).
+ *
+ * These parameters are determined by Kconfig options if configured; otherwise,
+ * they use sensible defaults based on system architecture (for RCU_FANOUT)
+ * or a fixed default (for RCU_FANOUT_LEAF).
* In theory, it should be possible to add more levels straightforwardly.
* In practice, this did work well going from three levels to four.
* Of course, your mileage may vary.
*/
+/* Define RCU_FANOUT: middle-level fan-out parameter */
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT
#define RCU_FANOUT CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT
-#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT */
+#else /* #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT */
# ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
# define RCU_FANOUT 64
# else
# define RCU_FANOUT 32
# endif
-#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT */
+#endif
+/* Define RCU_FANOUT_LEAF: leaf-level fan-out parameter (manages CPUs directly) */
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF
#define RCU_FANOUT_LEAF CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF
-#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF */
+#else /* #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF */
#define RCU_FANOUT_LEAF 16
-#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF */
+#endif
#define RCU_FANOUT_1 (RCU_FANOUT_LEAF)
#define RCU_FANOUT_2 (RCU_FANOUT_1 * RCU_FANOUT)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists