[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAOTY_8y6C5=jSjzBVVJ2vJq1L+Nf9U0tZvxzVX-e-3g91xEeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:59:17 +0000
From: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
To: Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@...labora.com>
Cc: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>,
kernel@...labora.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 05/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_hdmi_common: Make CEC support optional
Hi, Louis:
Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@...labora.com> 於 2025年10月23日
週四 上午10:32寫道:
>
> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>
> In preparation for adding a new driver for HDMIv2, for which CEC
> is not strictly required, change the of_get_compatible_child()
> failure error to -ENOTSUPP to be able to differentiate between
> error conditions in mtk_hdmi_dt_parse_pdata().
>
> In that case, if -ENOTSUPP is returned, this driver will print
> an informative message saying that CEC support is unavailable,
> as the devicetree node for that was not found, but after that,
> function mtk_hdmi_dt_parse_pdata() will not return error to
> the caller.
>
> This will not change functionality of the mtk_hdmi (v1) driver
> as that is still checking whether CEC is present and, if not,
> will fail probing with an error saying that CEC is required
> by HDMIv1.
>
> Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_common.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_common.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_common.c
> index f28e63716d7c2e2c6bdf5b28d24789bc926d2beb..989479fdfe40952762a1b63797bf602b520dcac5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_common.c
> @@ -253,12 +253,11 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_get_cec_dev(struct mtk_hdmi *hdmi, struct device *dev, struc
> /* The CEC module handles HDMI hotplug detection */
> cec_np = of_get_compatible_child(np->parent, "mediatek,mt8173-cec");
> if (!cec_np)
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Failed to find CEC node\n");
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOTSUPP, "Failed to find CEC node\n");
The checkpatch show the warning:
WARNING: ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP
#40: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_common.c:256:
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOTSUPP, "Failed to find CEC node\n");
I find many driver use ENOTSUPP, so I'm not sure which one is better.
I really don't understand the description about these two error code [1].
If you choose ENOTSUPP, please give me some explain.
[1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/errno.3.html
Regards,
Chun-Kuang.
>
> cec_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(cec_np);
> if (!cec_pdev) {
> - dev_err(hdmi->dev, "Waiting for CEC device %pOF\n",
> - cec_np);
> + dev_err(hdmi->dev, "Waiting for CEC device %pOF\n", cec_np);
> of_node_put(cec_np);
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> }
> @@ -319,7 +318,9 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_dt_parse_pdata(struct mtk_hdmi *hdmi, struct platform_device
> return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Failed to get ddc i2c adapter by node\n");
>
> ret = mtk_hdmi_get_cec_dev(hdmi, dev, np);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret == -ENOTSUPP)
> + dev_info(dev, "CEC support unavailable: node not found\n");
> + else if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> return 0;
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists