[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12786727.O9o76ZdvQC@rafael.j.wysocki>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 19:12:57 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>
Subject:
[PATCH v1] cpuidle: governors: menu: Select polling state in some more cases
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
A throughput regression of 11% introduced by commit 779b1a1cb13a ("cpuidle:
governors: menu: Avoid selecting states with too much latency") has been
reported and it is related to the case when the menu governor checks if
selecting a proper idle state instead of a polling one makes sense.
In particular, it is questionable to do so if the exit latency of the
idle state in question exceeds the predicted idle duration, so add a
check for that, which is sufficient to make the reported regression go
away, and update the related code comment accordingly.
Fixes: 779b1a1cb13a ("cpuidle: governors: menu: Avoid selecting states with too much latency")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/004501dc43c9$ec8aa930$c59ffb90$@telus.net/
Reported-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
Tested-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
Cc: All applicable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
@@ -321,10 +321,13 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_dr
/*
* Use a physical idle state, not busy polling, unless a timer
- * is going to trigger soon enough.
+ * is going to trigger soon enough or the exit latency of the
+ * idle state in question is greater than the predicted idle
+ * duration.
*/
if ((drv->states[idx].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING) &&
- s->target_residency_ns <= data->next_timer_ns) {
+ s->target_residency_ns <= data->next_timer_ns &&
+ s->exit_latency_ns <= predicted_ns) {
predicted_ns = s->target_residency_ns;
idx = i;
break;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists