lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251023-lizard-sharpie-70f2a000327f@spud>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 19:30:47 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Vivian Wang <wangruikang@...as.ac.cn>
Cc: michael.opdenacker@...tcommit.com, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
	Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...il.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	spacemit@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] riscv: dts: spacemit: add Ethernet and PDMA to
 OrangePi RV2

On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 01:58:22PM +0800, Vivian Wang wrote:
> Thank you so much for the patch and testing results. Only some nitpicks
> follow.
> 
> On 10/23/25 04:18, michael.opdenacker@...tcommit.com wrote:
> > From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...tcommit.com>
> >
> > The OrangePi RV2 board ships two RGMII ethernet ports.
> > Each has an external Motorcomm YT8531C PHY attached, the PHY uses GPIO
> > for reset pin control.
> >
> > Enable PDMA for the SpacemiT K1-based SoC in the OrangePi RV2 board.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...tcommit.com>
> > CC: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...il.com>
> > CC: Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>
> > CC: Vivian Wang <wangruikang@...as.ac.cn>
> 
> Firstly, it is usually spelt "Cc:", with one upper-case C and one
> lower-case c.

I don't think this matters at all, the git tooling at least doesn't
care.

> Secondly, "Cc:" should not be necessary in the patch/commit message.
> From Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:
> 
>     If a person has had the opportunity to comment on a patch, but has not
>     provided such comments, you may optionally add a ``Cc:`` tag to the patch.
>     This tag documents that potentially interested parties have been included in
>     the discussion.
> 
> If you look through the git logs of Linux, Cc tags are really not a
> regular occurrence except those marking patches as suitable for
> backporting to stable.

If people want to handle CC lists by putting it in the patches (it's
what I do when I have no cover letter) just put them after the --- line
and git send-email will still pick the CCs up but they won't end up in
the history.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ