[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPp5OYcPxNNIOgB6@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 21:51:37 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Akhilesh Patil <akhilesh@...iitb.ac.in>, jic23@...nel.org,
dlechner@...libre.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org,
marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com, vassilisamir@...il.com,
salah.triki@...il.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, akhileshpatilvnit@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: pressure: adp810: Add driver for adp810 sensor
On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 05:12:26AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/10/2025 16:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2025 at 3:25 PM Akhilesh Patil <akhilesh@...iitb.ac.in> wrote:
> >> +AOSONG ADP810 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE SENSOR DRIVER
> >> +M: Akhilesh Patil <akhilesh@...iitb.ac.in>
> >> +L: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
> >> +S: Maintained
> >> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/pressure/aosong,adp810.yaml
> >> +F: drivers/iio/pressure/adp810.c
> >
> > Some tools will report an orphaned yaml file if you apply patch 1
> > without patch 2.
>
> You mean checkpatch? That warning is not really relevant. Adding
> maintainers entry here for both files is perfectly fine and correct.
It's relevant as long as I see (false positive) warnings from it. Can somebody
shut the checkpatch up about missing DT files in the MAINTAINERS?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists