linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 08/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework init function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20251023-mt8196-ufs-v3-8-0f04b4a795ff@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 21:49:26 +0200
From: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, 
 Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, 
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, 
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, 
 Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, 
 Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, 
 Peter Wang <peter.wang@...iatek.com>, Stanley Jhu <chu.stanley@...il.com>, 
 "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, 
 "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, 
 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, 
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@...labora.com>, 
 kernel@...labora.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, 
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, 
 linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, 
 Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 08/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework init function

Printing an error message on ENOMEM is pointless. The print will not
work because there is no memory.

Adding an of_match_device to the init function is pointless. Why would a
different device with a different probe function ever use the same init
function? Get rid of it.

zero-initialising an error variable just so you can then goto a bare
return statement with that error variable to signal success is also
pointless, just return directly, there's no unwind being done.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
---
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c | 19 ++++---------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
index a7aab2332ef2..131f71145a12 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
@@ -1248,29 +1248,19 @@ static int ufs_mtk_get_supplies(struct ufs_mtk_host *host)
  */
 static int ufs_mtk_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 {
-	const struct of_device_id *id;
 	struct device *dev = hba->dev;
 	struct ufs_mtk_host *host;
 	struct Scsi_Host *shost = hba->host;
-	int err = 0;
+	int err;
 	struct arm_smccc_res res;

 	host = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*host), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!host) {
-		err = -ENOMEM;
-		dev_info(dev, "%s: no memory for mtk ufs host\n", __func__);
-		goto out;
-	}
+	if (!host)
+		return -ENOMEM;

 	host->hba = hba;
 	ufshcd_set_variant(hba, host);

-	id = of_match_device(ufs_mtk_of_match, dev);
-	if (!id) {
-		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
 	/* Initialize host capability */
 	ufs_mtk_init_host_caps(hba);

@@ -1344,11 +1334,10 @@ static int ufs_mtk_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)

 	ufs_mtk_get_hw_ip_version(hba);

-	goto out;
+	return 0;

 out_variant_clear:
 	ufshcd_set_variant(hba, NULL);
-out:
 	return err;
 }

-- 
2.51.1.dirty