[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hhnAq-HJhXU8VTAWKNg0PJkYbeocCKEffYOurZn0U81Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 11:58:27 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: MRRM: Check revision of MRRM table
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 10:45 PM Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Before trying to parse the MRRM table, check that the table revision
> is the one that is expected.
OK, so should there be a Fixes: tag? Or is it just a tidy-up of the code?
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_mrrm.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_mrrm.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_mrrm.c
> index 47ea3ccc2142..a6dbf623e557 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_mrrm.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_mrrm.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ static __init int acpi_parse_mrrm(struct acpi_table_header *table)
> if (!mrrm)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + if (mrrm->header.revision != 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> if (mrrm->flags & ACPI_MRRM_FLAGS_REGION_ASSIGNMENT_OS)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists