linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: arm: Convert Marvell CP110 System Controller to DT schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqL+DY4j62m3_BVjC7_o9Hbx4a54UORDNBC+Pg0YAQCO+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 06:12:48 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, 
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, 
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, 
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: arm: Convert Marvell CP110 System
 Controller to DT schema

On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 1:57 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> > Convert the Marvell CP110 System Controller binding to DT schema
> > format.
> >
> > There's not any specific compatible for the whole block which is a
> > separate problem, so just the child nodes are documented. Only the
> > pinctrl and clock child nodes need to be converted as the GPIO node
> > already has a schema.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
>
> [...]
>
> > +  "#clock-cells":
> > +    const: 2
> > +    description: >
>
> I am surprised you prefer a description to a constraint expressed with
> yaml. Yet, I am totally fine with it.

I don't, but no one has come up with a way to put constraints here and
then apply them to 'clocks' properties as appropriate.

>
> Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>

Thanks.

Rob