[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251023022642.742834-1-tanze@kylinos.cn>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 10:26:42 +0800
From: tanze <tanze@...inos.cn>
To: colyli@...as.com,
john.g.garry@...cle.com,
kent.overstreet@...ux.dev
Cc: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tanze <tanze@...inos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v2] bcache: Use vmalloc_array() to improve code
Remove array_size() calls and replace vmalloc(),
due to vmalloc_array() being optimized better,
using fewer instructions, and handling overflow more concisely.
Signed-off-by: tanze <tanze@...inos.cn>
---
Hi, Coly Li.
Thank you for your suggestions.
I have made revisions according to your requirements.
Do you have any further suggestions?
---
Changes in v2:
- Fix coding style and formatting issues.
---
drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
index 826b14cae4e5..1ecd2cb3d302 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
@@ -1061,8 +1061,8 @@ SHOW(__bch_cache)
uint16_t q[31], *p, *cached;
ssize_t ret;
- cached = p = vmalloc(array_size(sizeof(uint16_t),
- ca->sb.nbuckets));
+ cached = p = vmalloc_array(ca->sb.nbuckets, sizeof(uint16_t));
+
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists