[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMgjq7DuJp_zyW4NLHPoA8iDYC+2PaVZT4XzETV-okVUPLNzSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 21:26:14 +0800
From: Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>, Ying Huang <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
YoungJun Park <youngjun.park@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm, swap: misc cleanup and bugfix
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 9:18 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 02:00:38AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> > A few cleanups and a bugfix that are either suitable after the swap
> > table phase I or found during code review.
> >
> > Patch 1 is a bugfix and needs to be included in the stable branch,
> > the rest have no behavior change.
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Update commit message for patch 1, it's a sub-optimal fix and a better
> > fix can be done later. [ Chris Li ]
> > - Fix a lock balance issue in patch 1. [ YoungJun Park ]
> > - Add a trivial cleanup patch to remove an unused argument,
> > no behavior change.
> > - Update kernel doc.
> > - Fix minor issue with commit message [ Nhat Pham ]
> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251007-swap-clean-after-swap-table-p1-v1-0-74860ef8ba74@tencent.com
> >
> > ---
> > Kairui Song (5):
> > mm, swap: do not perform synchronous discard during allocation
>
> FYI For some reason this commit is not present on lore, see [0]
>
> [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251024-swap-clean-after-swap-table-p1-v2-0-a709469052e7@tencent.com/
Thanks for letting me know, strangely, it is here:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251024-swap-clean-after-swap-table-p1-v2-1-c5b0e1092927@tencent.com
But the In-reply-to id is wrong. I'm using b4 and somehow patch 1 was
blocked by gmail's SMTP so I had to try to resend patch 1 again,
something went wrong with that part. I'll try to find out the problem
and avoid that from happening again.
I'm seeing that patch 1 is being merged into mm tree just fine, I
guess that should be OK.
If anyone is reading the threads, this url above should be helpful.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists