[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19a168d95e8.7a90f7d35482131.1689650792018355758@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 16:09:29 +0200
From: Valentine Burley <valentine.burley@...labora.com>
To: "Rob Clark" <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: "dri-devel" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"freedreno" <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-arm-msm" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Sean Paul" <sean@...rly.run>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
"Dmitry Baryshkov" <lumag@...nel.org>,
"Abhinav Kumar" <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
"Jessica Zhang" <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
"Marijn Suijten" <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@...ll.ch>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Reject MAP_NULL op if no PRR
Hi,
This fixes the GPU faults and hangs I was seeing on sc7180.
Tested-by: Valentine Burley <valentine.burley@...labora.com>
Thanks!
Valentine
---- On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 00:20:51 +0200 Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com> wrote ---
> We need PRR support in order to implement MAP_NULL. Userspace shouldn't
> be trying to use this if it is unsupported.
>
> Reported-by: Valentine Burley <valentine.burley@...labora.com>
> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/37935#note_3153730
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 7 -------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> index 19181b6fddfd..f93eee67240d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> @@ -365,13 +365,6 @@ int adreno_fault_handler(struct msm_gpu *gpu, unsigned long iova, int flags,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static bool
> -adreno_smmu_has_prr(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> -{
> - struct adreno_smmu_priv *adreno_smmu = dev_get_drvdata(&gpu->pdev->dev);
> - return adreno_smmu && adreno_smmu->set_prr_addr;
> -}
> -
> int adreno_get_param(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_context *ctx,
> uint32_t param, uint64_t *value, uint32_t *len)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c
> index 90712586faac..96925a0f3965 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c
> @@ -964,6 +964,7 @@ static int
> lookup_op(struct msm_vm_bind_job *job, const struct drm_msm_vm_bind_op *op)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = job->vm->drm;
> + struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
> int i = job->nr_ops++;
> int ret = 0;
>
> @@ -1010,6 +1011,11 @@ lookup_op(struct msm_vm_bind_job *job, const struct drm_msm_vm_bind_op *op)
> break;
> }
>
> + if ((op->op == MSM_VM_BIND_OP_MAP_NULL) &&
> + !adreno_smmu_has_prr(priv->gpu)) {
> + ret = UERR(EINVAL, dev, "PRR not supported\n");
> + }
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h
> index a597f2bee30b..2894fc118485 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h
> @@ -299,6 +299,17 @@ static inline struct msm_gpu *dev_to_gpu(struct device *dev)
> return container_of(adreno_smmu, struct msm_gpu, adreno_smmu);
> }
>
> +static inline bool
> +adreno_smmu_has_prr(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> +{
> + struct adreno_smmu_priv *adreno_smmu = dev_get_drvdata(&gpu->pdev->dev);
> +
> + if (!adreno_smmu)
> + return false;
> +
> + return adreno_smmu && adreno_smmu->set_prr_addr;
> +}
> +
> /* It turns out that all targets use the same ringbuffer size */
> #define MSM_GPU_RINGBUFFER_SZ SZ_32K
> #define MSM_GPU_RINGBUFFER_BLKSIZE 32
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists