lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: 
 <CAGwozwHAJAvgZEgn1M0ioRP4dT2urMUtQQzNXKXydu0ueoOzsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 18:24:11 +0200
From: Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@...heas.dev>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
 Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
	Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] drm/amdgpu: only send the SMU RLC notification on
 S3

On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 at 18:20, Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@....com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/24/2025 10:54 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10/24/2025 10:21 AM, Antheas Kapenekakis wrote:
> >> From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
> >>
> >> For S0ix, the RLC is not powered down. Rework the Van Gogh logic to
> >> skip powering it down and skip part of post-init.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 8c4e9105b2a8 ("drm/amdgpu: optimize RLC powerdown notification
> >> on Vangogh")
> >> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/4659
> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
> >> Tested-by: Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@...heas.dev>
> >> Signed-off-by: Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@...heas.dev>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c       | 8 +++++---
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c        | 6 ++++++
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c | 3 +++
> >>   3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/
> >> drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> >> index 3d032c4e2dce..220b12d59795 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> >> @@ -5243,9 +5243,11 @@ int amdgpu_device_suspend(struct drm_device
> >> *dev, bool notify_clients)
> >>       if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev))
> >>           amdgpu_virt_release_full_gpu(adev, false);
> >> -    r = amdgpu_dpm_notify_rlc_state(adev, false);
> >> -    if (r)
> >> -        return r;
> >> +    if (!adev->in_s0ix) {
> >> +        r = amdgpu_dpm_notify_rlc_state(adev, false);
> >> +        if (r)
> >> +            return r;
> >> +    }
> >
> > Just FYI this is going to clash with my unwind failed suspend series [1].
> >
> > This is fine, just whichever "lands" first the other will need to rework
> > a little bit and I wanted to mention it.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/20251023165243.317153-2-
> > mario.limonciello@....com/ [1]
> >
> > This does have me wondering though why amdgpu_dpm_notify_rlc_state() is
> > even in amdgpu_device_suspend()?  This is only used on Van Gogh.
> > Should we be pushing this deeper into amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase2()?
> >
> > Or should we maybe overhaul this to move the RLC notification into
> > a .set_mp1_state callback instead so it's more similar to all the other
> > ASICs?
> >
>
> My proposal as such is here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/20251024161216.345691-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com/
>
> It would need some testing though to make sure it didn't break Steam
> Deck or Steam Deck OLED.

I will give it a quick go on my OLED.


> >>       return 0;
> >>   }
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c b/drivers/gpu/
> >> drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
> >> index fb8086859857..244b8c364d45 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
> >> @@ -2040,6 +2040,12 @@ static int smu_disable_dpms(struct smu_context
> >> *smu)
> >>           smu->is_apu && (amdgpu_in_reset(adev) || adev->in_s0ix))
> >>           return 0;
> >> +    /* vangogh s0ix */
> >> +    if ((amdgpu_ip_version(adev, MP1_HWIP, 0) == IP_VERSION(11, 5, 0) ||
> >> +         amdgpu_ip_version(adev, MP1_HWIP, 0) == IP_VERSION(11, 5,
> >> 2)) &&
> >> +        adev->in_s0ix)
> >> +        return 0;
> >> +
> >
> > How about for GPU reset, does PMFW handle this too?
> >
> >>       /*
> >>        * For gpu reset, runpm and hibernation through BACO,
> >>        * BACO feature has to be kept enabled.
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c b/
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c
> >> index 2c9869feba61..0708d0f0938b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c
> >> @@ -2217,6 +2217,9 @@ static int vangogh_post_smu_init(struct
> >> smu_context *smu)
> >>       uint32_t total_cu = adev->gfx.config.max_cu_per_sh *
> >>           adev->gfx.config.max_sh_per_se * adev-
> >> >gfx.config.max_shader_engines;
> >> +    if (adev->in_s0ix)
> >> +        return 0;
> >> +
> >>       /* allow message will be sent after enable message on Vangogh*/
> >>       if (smu_cmn_feature_is_enabled(smu, SMU_FEATURE_DPM_GFXCLK_BIT) &&
> >>               (adev->pg_flags & AMD_PG_SUPPORT_GFX_PG)) {
> >
>
>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ