[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <026a32413b0c9e4edb5d3ab411d18134078430d8.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:14:37 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Ally Heev <allyheev@...il.com>, Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc: workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
David Hunter <david.hunter.linux@...il.com>, Shuah Khan
<skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth
Menon <nm@...com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-pm
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, dan.j.williams@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] checkpatch: add uninitialized pointer with
__free attribute check
On Fri, 2025-10-24 at 22:59 +0530, Ally Heev wrote:
> uninitialized pointers with __free attribute can cause undefined
> behaviour as the memory allocated to the pointer is freed
> automatically when the pointer goes out of scope.
> add check in checkpatch to detect such issues
>
> Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8a4c0b43-cf63-400d-b33d-d9c447b7e0b9@suswa.mountain/
> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ally Heev <allyheev@...il.com>
> ---
> Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst | 5 +++++
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
> index d5c47e560324fb2399a5b1bc99c891ed1de10535..1a304bf38bcd27e50bbb7cd4383b07ac54d20b0a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
> @@ -1009,6 +1009,11 @@ Functions and Variables
>
> return bar;
>
> + **UNINITIALIZED_PTR_WITH_FREE**
> + Pointers with __free attribute should be initialized. Not doing so
> + may lead to undefined behavior as the memory allocated (garbage,
> + in case not initialized) to the pointer is freed automatically
> + when the pointer goes out of scope.
>
> Permissions
> -----------
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 92669904eecc7a8d2afd3f2625528e02b6d17cd6..1009a4a065e910143dabeee6640b3b3a4bd3fe06 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -509,6 +509,7 @@ our $InitAttributeData = qr{$InitAttributePrefix(?:initdata\b)};
> our $InitAttributeConst = qr{$InitAttributePrefix(?:initconst\b)};
> our $InitAttributeInit = qr{$InitAttributePrefix(?:init\b)};
> our $InitAttribute = qr{$InitAttributeData|$InitAttributeConst|$InitAttributeInit};
> +our $FreeAttribute = qr{__free\s*\(\s*$Ident\s*\)};
If you are really suggesting using this, and I don't think it's
particularly useful, please use
out $InitAttributeFree = qr{$InitAttributePrefix(?:free\s*\(\s*$Ident\s*\)};
>
> # Notes to $Attribute:
> # We need \b after 'init' otherwise 'initconst' will cause a false positive in a check
> @@ -7721,6 +7722,12 @@ sub process {
> ERROR("MISSING_SENTINEL", "missing sentinel in ID array\n" . "$here\n$stat\n");
> }
> }
> +
> +# check for uninitialized pointers with __free attribute
> + while ($line =~ /\*\s*($Ident)\s+$FreeAttribute\s*[,;]/g) {
> + ERROR("UNINITIALIZED_PTR_WITH_FREE",
> + "pointer '$1' with __free attribute should be initialized\n" . $herecurr);
> + }
> }
>
> # If we have no input at all, then there is nothing to report on
Powered by blists - more mailing lists