lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251024192918.3191141-4-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 19:29:18 +0000
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>,
	stable@...r.kernel
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: nSVM: Avoid incorrect injection of SVM_EXIT_CR0_SEL_WRITE

When emulating L2 instructions, svm_check_intercept() checks whether a
write to CR0 should trigger a synthesized #VMEXIT with
SVM_EXIT_CR0_SEL_WRITE. However, it does not check whether L1 enabled
the intercept for SVM_EXIT_WRITE_CR0, which has higher priority
according to the APM (24593—Rev.  3.42—March 2024, Table 15-7):

  When both selective and non-selective CR0-write
  intercepts are active at the same time, the non-selective
  intercept takes priority. With respect to exceptions, the
  priority of this inter

Make sure L1 does NOT intercept SVM_EXIT_WRITE_CR0 before checking if
SVM_EXIT_CR0_SEL_WRITE needs to be injected.

Fixes: cfec82cb7d31 ("KVM: SVM: Add intercept check for emulated cr accesses")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 9ea0ff136e299..4f79c4d837535 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -4533,12 +4533,22 @@ static int svm_check_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		if (info->intercept == x86_intercept_cr_write)
 			icpt_info.exit_code += info->modrm_reg;
 
+		/*
+		 * If the write is indeed to CR0, check whether the exit_code
+		 * needs to be converted to SVM_EXIT_CR0_SEL_WRITE. Intercepting
+		 * SVM_EXIT_WRITE_CR0 has higher priority than
+		 * SVM_EXIT_CR0_SEL_WRITE, so this is only relevant if L1 sets
+		 * INTERCEPT_SELECTIVE_CR0 but not INTERCEPT_CR0_WRITE.
+		 */
 		if (icpt_info.exit_code != SVM_EXIT_WRITE_CR0 ||
-		    info->intercept == x86_intercept_clts)
+		    vmcb12_is_intercept(&svm->nested.ctl,
+					INTERCEPT_CR0_WRITE) ||
+		    !(vmcb12_is_intercept(&svm->nested.ctl,
+					  INTERCEPT_SELECTIVE_CR0)))
 			break;
 
-		if (!(vmcb12_is_intercept(&svm->nested.ctl,
-					INTERCEPT_SELECTIVE_CR0)))
+		/* CLTS never triggers INTERCEPT_SELECTIVE_CR0 */
+		if (info->intercept == x86_intercept_clts)
 			break;
 
 		/* LMSW always triggers INTERCEPT_SELECTIVE_CR0 */
-- 
2.51.1.821.gb6fe4d2222-goog


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ