[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <673f8cfa-e541-4f17-bc1f-dc0c429d72b7@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 20:45:10 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Han Gao <rabenda.cn@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Skip devicetree kunit tests when RISCV+ACPI doesn't
populate root node
On 10/23/25 18:00, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 11:48 AM Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2025, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>>> Starting with commit 69a8b62a7aa1 ("riscv: acpi: avoid errors caused by
>>> probing DT devices when ACPI is used"), riscv images no longer populate
>>> devicetree if ACPI is enabled. This causes unit tests to fail which require
>>> the root node to be set.
>>>
>>> # Subtest: of_dtb
>>> # module: of_test
>>> 1..2
>>> # of_dtb_root_node_found_by_path: EXPECTATION FAILED at drivers/of/of_test.c:21
>>> Expected np is not null, but is
>>> # of_dtb_root_node_found_by_path: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
>>> not ok 1 of_dtb_root_node_found_by_path
>>> # of_dtb_root_node_populates_of_root: EXPECTATION FAILED at drivers/of/of_test.c:31
>>> Expected of_root is not null, but is
>>> # of_dtb_root_node_populates_of_root: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
>>> not ok 2 of_dtb_root_node_populates_of_root
>>>
>>> Skip those tests for RISCV if the root node is not populated.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 69a8b62a7aa1 ("riscv: acpi: avoid errors caused by probing DT devices when ACPI is used")
>>> Cc: Han Gao <rabenda.cn@...il.com>
>>> Cc: Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org> # arch/riscv
>
> FWIW, the fixed commit will also prevent enabling features like this
> series[1] enables. Arm64 is still disabled ATM because of disagreement
> with the arm64 maintainers, so that can was kicked down the road. It
> would be better to not disable this and address the issues as they
> happen rather than breaking people down the road.
>
I guess that means that I'll have to disable devicetree unit tests for
riscv targets. NP; thanks for letting me know.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists