[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251024131004.01e1bce7@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 13:10:04 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Ankit Garg <nktgrg@...gle.com>
Cc: Joshua Washington <joshwash@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@...gle.com>, Jordan Rhee
<jordanrhee@...gle.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexei
Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend
<john.fastabend@...il.com>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Praveen
Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@...gle.com>, Ziwei Xiao <ziweixiao@...gle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:XDP (eXpress Data
Path):Keyword:(?:b|_)xdp(?:b|_)" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] gve: Allow ethtool to configure rx_buf_len
On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:17:04 -0700 Ankit Garg wrote:
> > Please plumb extack thru to here. It's inside struct netdev_bpf
>
> Using extack just for this log will make it inconsistent with other
> logs in this method. Would it be okay if I send a fast follow patch to
> use exstack in this method and others?
Could you make it part of this series, tho?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists