linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] usb: typec: ucsi: Add support for orientation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <vbbz2jfisxnjiblasbtay5mnaphsio5qnjrqbxjztykdvgvxfl@sdicu53m3pil>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 23:19:46 +0300
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, 
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] usb: typec: ucsi: Add support for orientation

On 25-10-15 16:00:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 04:50:36PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > According to UCSI 2.0 specification, the orientation is
> > part of the connector status payload. So tie up the port
> > orientation.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.h |  3 +++
> >  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
> 
> Why is this a "RFC"?  What is the request?
> 

My bad. Posted as an RFC since I wasn't sure if I tied the ucsi_orientation
correctly, meaning in all the right places.

Let me know if you want me to respin this as a proper patch.