[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQKYkMVmjMrRhsg29fgYKQU8=bDJW3ghTHLbmFHJPmdNxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 15:34:37 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 03/19] slub: remove CONFIG_SLUB_TINY specific code paths
On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 6:53 AM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> CONFIG_SLUB_TINY minimizes the SLUB's memory overhead in multiple ways,
> mainly by avoiding percpu caching of slabs and objects. It also reduces
> code size by replacing some code paths with simplified ones through
> ifdefs, but the benefits of that are smaller and would complicate the
> upcoming changes.
>
> Thus remove these code paths and associated ifdefs and simplify the code
> base.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> ---
> mm/slab.h | 2 --
> mm/slub.c | 107 +++-----------------------------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
Looks like it is removing most of it.
Just remove the whole thing. Do people care about keeping SLUB_TINY?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists