[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <afd40022-012a-4fa5-90f1-a27f11aa9549@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 09:52:27 +0200
From: Richard GENOUD <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra
<vigneshr@...com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>,
Wentao Liang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/15] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce ecc_mode_mask in
sunxi_nfc_caps
Hi,
Le 22/10/2025 à 11:05, Miquel Raynal a écrit :
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 20/10/2025 at 12:13:03 +02, Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
>> The H6/H616 ECC_MODE field is not at the same offset, and has not the
>> same size.
>> So move the mask into sunxi_nfc_caps.
>>
>> No functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 13 +++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
>> index 70c940840dda..4118307cac15 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
>> @@ -29,8 +29,9 @@
>> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>> #include <linux/reset.h>
>>
>> -/* non compile-time field get */
>> +/* non compile-time field get/prep */
>> #define field_get(_mask, _reg) (((_reg) & (_mask)) >> (ffs(_mask) - 1))
>> +#define field_prep(_mask, _val) (((_val) << (ffs(_mask) - 1)) &
>> (_mask))
>
> This could probably require a mention in the commit message, as for the
> introduction of the field_get() helper.
>
> No need to resend just for this either.
Ok, will do.
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
>
Thanks!
--
Richard Genoud, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists